I hadn’t heard of Hildegarde before so this was extraordinary! A wonderful post - so filled with interesting points and ideas - as always! Reading Michelangelo’s grumpy words and then seeing the Sistine Chapel was lovely.
I definitely came across Hildegarde in many art classes but I never explored her in great detail. She always seemed an intriguing character and I am inspired to do my own research. Thanks for that.
Thanks you for writing. Meanwhile I was reading I’ve listened “A Feather on the Breath of God”, Sequences and Hymns by Abbess Hildegard of Bingen. Remarkable!
I hadn’t heard of Hildegarde before so this was extraordinary! A wonderful post - so filled with interesting points and ideas - as always! Reading Michelangelo’s grumpy words and then seeing the Sistine Chapel was lovely.
Spengler suggests Blake to me. The Marriage of Heaven and Hell:
Thus one portion of being is the Prolific, the other the Devouring.
To the devourer it seems as if the producer was in his chains; but it is not so, he only takes portions of existence, and fancies that the whole.
But the Prolific would cease to be prolific unless the Devourer as a
sea received the excess of his delights.
Some will say, "Is not God alone the Prolific?" I answer: "God only
acts and is in existing beings or men."
These two classes of men are always upon earth, and they should be
enemies: whoever tries to reconcile them seeks to destroy existence.
I definitely came across Hildegarde in many art classes but I never explored her in great detail. She always seemed an intriguing character and I am inspired to do my own research. Thanks for that.
Thanks you for writing. Meanwhile I was reading I’ve listened “A Feather on the Breath of God”, Sequences and Hymns by Abbess Hildegard of Bingen. Remarkable!